Fortunately the 65 and 45mm lenses are easier to find and outstanding in quality. Then, the lens options are extremely limited since the scarce 100mm and 135mm lenses are going for 2x-3x original prices. First, it's very compact, about 2cm taller than a Leica M but no larger in other dimensions (with normal lens and hood). But I do have a pair of Bronica RF645's and have developed considerable respect for the camera. Hi Brian - I cannot compare the two from personal experience, as I've never held a Mamiya 6. I'm looking for any opinions from users of either camera and especially users ofīoth! Any suggestions, help and direction is greatly appreciated! Which really scares me because either camera I get, I'm going to get it used. Hard to find, and the winding mechanism goes back after a few hundred rolls, Then there's the issue that I keep reading about the Mamiya 6's parts are so That's hard to believe because if there was one thing to die for about the Reviews and the Bronica RF 645's lenses actually tested better than the Mamiyaħ's. Went back through my Pop Photo magazines and found the reviews from the Mamiyaħii (basically the same as the Mamiya 6) and the Bronica RF 645 including lens I understand it's not 6圆, but it sounds very intriquing. But I'm reading more and more about theīronica RF 645. I ditched the SQ-A because it was too bulky, and Iĭitched the Mamiya 7 because I liked the 6圆 format better. I've narrowed my twoĬhoices to the Bronica RF 645 and the Mamiya 6. I'm looking to purchase a medium format rangefinder.
0 kommentar(er)
